Innovation in public administration and management is demonstrated by novel or alternative means as well as replicable or adaptable solutions that generate significant incremental value to the administrative body (bodies) and/or to the citizens it (they) serves (serve).
2016 IIA categories include:
INNOVATION DNA – A celebration of innovation as a strategic imperative in the public service, this category recognises initiatives centred on building internal capacity for creativity and innovation, embedding open innovation practices in government, and systematically soliciting input at all levels. It is characterised by an environment where innovation, creativity, space to challenge, and noble failure have become, or are becoming, inherent to the climate, mind-set, attitudes and structures of the organisation and its leadership. Submissions to the Innovation DNA category would typically demonstrate initiatives that:
- cultivate the necessary conditions to increase opportunities to inspire others;
- deliberately put the organisation into environments that encourage new thinking;
- promote innovation as a function of the organisation; and
- pursue the goal of realising the results of innovation regardless of obstacles and criticism.
INNOVATION IN PUBLIC SERVICE MANAGEMENT – This category recognises innovations that are largely internal/inward-facing to government and consist of functional or whole-of-system policies or business processes. It showcases innovative solutions to the everyday, underlying demands of running a public service organisation in any number of fields such as:
- Information management/information technology
- Human resources management
- Financial management
- Risk management
- Project management
- Change management
- Acquisitions and procurement
- Asset management
- Oversight, accountability or governance
CITIZEN-FOCUSED INNOVATION – Ultimately governments exist to serve their citizens, and this category honours innovative policies, programmes, services, and access to services that are outward-facing and client-based. This category showcases solutions that address root causes or emerging societal demands for the delivery of the organisation's programmes and services to citizens and other external partners.
INNOVATION INCUBATION – All innovations begin with the spark of an idea from organisations that dare to push the boundaries and try new approaches. This category celebrates innovation that represents early thinking and promotes unproven innovative ideas that have not yet become replicable actions. It highlights amazingly radical and promising forward thinking that can ignite further ideas for innovative practices. The Innovation Incubation category would typically showcase early creative thinking on an important, enduring or emerging management, service or societal challenge.
Note: In previous years the IIAs have included a specific ‘Innovative Use of Technologies in the Public Service’ category. Because technology has become an integral part of all aspects of public service, CAPAM considers innovative technology to be crosscutting and is now included as a component in each 2016 IIA category.
To be eligible, the innovation submission(s) must:
- fit within one of the four 2016 IIA categories;
- be submitted by an individual or a team associated with the innovation project;
- reflect an organisational rather than an individual achievement;
- originate from a public service organisation at a national, state or local government level; OR where the project is carried out in partnership with another entity and the submission is being made by that entity (i.e. civil society, para-governmental organisation, etc.), government involvement and oversight must be clearly demonstrated;
- have come to fruition (since January 2012), be in active operation, and undergone evaluation (please note: this criterion does not apply to submissions under the category “Innovation Incubation”);
- be accompanied by a letter from a senior public official authorizing the applicant to participate in the competition; and
- include the submission payment fee.
The following criteria are used to evaluate all submissions to the awards programme and are assigned a weighting factor out of 10:
Leadership in Innovation Creation
(weight of 2)
The extent to which the innovation makes use of innovation-inducing practices, for example:
Impact of innovation
(weight of 3)
The extent to which the innovation contributes to and/or demonstrates notable positive improvements in, for example:
Replicability and Adaptability
(weight of 2)
The extent to which the innovation is able to be reproduced or modified and is relevant to other uses, functions, departments, ministries, jurisdictions, levels of government, and countries, for example:
(weight of 2)
The extent to which the innovation processes, outputs and/or outcomes have been disseminated and promoted by credible others (e.g., case studies, publications in journals, conference presentations), for example:
(weight of 1)
The extent to which the innovation has been subject to due diligence/risk management practices or independent review and assessment of impact, for example:
For innovations that are not fully implemented or that have not operated sufficiently to allow for an evaluation, other indicators to consider can include:
The submission process is now closed.
Step 1 – Projects are screened for eligibility and reviewed to determine semi-finalists. The semi-finalists are notified and their projects are posted on the CAPAM website in May, 2016.
Step 2 – Semi-finalist projects are adjudicated to select the top three submissions per category. The 12 finalists are notified and their projects are posted on the CAPAM website in June, 2016.
Step 3 – Finalists make face-to-face presentations to the assessment panel for adjudication to determine one winner per category and one overall winner. The presentations to the assessment panel take place two to three days before the start of the CAPAM Biennial Conference.
Step 4 – Finalists will present their innovations to conference participants as part the CAPAM Biennial Conference programme. The International Innovation Awards are presented at the President`s Dinner at the close of the CAPAM Biennial Conference.
Travel expenses associated with steps 3 and 4 are the responsibility of the finalists.
February 28, 2016: Submission deadline EXTENDED TO MARCH 16, 2016
March 2016: CAPAM staff organise submissions
April 2016: Reviewers adjudicate projects to determine semi-finalists
May 2016: Semi-finalists notified and projects posted on CAPAM website
May 2016: Assessment panel adjudicates semi-finalists to determine 12 finalists
June 2016: Finalists notified and announced on CAPAM website, finalists invited to present to assessment panel and at CAPAM biennial conference
August 2016: Finalists presentations to assessment panel, presentations as part of conference programme, IIA ceremony at the President`s Dinner at the close of the CAPAM Biennial Conference